Lastly, the 5D Mark IV has other nice features such as a high-resolution 3.2″ touchscreen LCD, built-in GPS and WiFi + NFC, none of which are offered on the D810 (the LCD on the D810 is not touch-enabled) and it is a tad lighter in comparison. Where the Nikon D810 stands out is in better flash sync speed, wider AE bracketing range, better Has phase-detection autofocus for videos. Canon EOS 5D Mark IV. Canon EOS Rebel T7i. A phase-detection autofocus system is faster than a contrast detection autofocus system. Even when recording scenes with a lot of fast movements, the videos are sharp and clear. has continuous autofocus when recording movies. Compare Sony A7 III vs Canon 5D Mark IV | B&H Photo Still Image Capture . Image Sizes . 16:9 Raw 20 MP (6000 x 3376) 3:2 Raw 24 MP (6000 x 4000) 16:9 JPEG Pixels: 5D Mark I - 12.8Mp, 5D Mark II - 21.1Mp, 5D Mark IIi - 22.3Mp, 5D Mark IV - 30.4Mp (the IV has more than doubled the number of pixels first seen on the Mark I). That meant shooting wide open f2.8 most of the time, and ISO 3200 to 12,800 for every single photo without flash. What follows below are some album page designs consisting of ambient light high ISO shots. All were taken at either 3200, 6400 or 12,800. Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Canon EF 400mm F4 DO IS II USM Canon EOS RP Canon Extender EF 1.4x III Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM + Excellent image quality, powerful autofocus The Canon 5D Mark III was shot with the Canon EF 20mm f/2.8 USM ( $500) with an in-camera lens profile. The LEICA M typ 240 was shot with a LEICA SUPER-ELMAR-M 21mm f/3.4 ASPH ( $3,000) with an in-camera lens profile. The Sony A7 was shot with the same LEICA SUPER-ELMAR-M 21mm f/3.4 ASPH, but with no lens profile. Here is the full EOS 5D Mark IV vs. 5Ds specifications comparison. Obvious from the table above is that the EOS 5Ds/5Ds R has one notable advantage over the EOS 5D Mark IV – resolution. The 5Ds R model, specifically, also has a slight sharpness advantage on the 5D IV as the latter features a traditional low-pass filter without the R's The Canon 5D Mark III from 2012 was a home run for Canon, a bonafide, hands down shot right out of the ballpark. Receiving a rare 5.0 overall score from us at IR -- and a well-deserved one at that As indicated by the table above, the Sony a7R III is smaller and lighter than the Canon 5D Mark IV, traits that many will appreciate. But, there are drawbacks to the a7R III's smaller size and lighter weight. The first drawback is that the smaller design leads to a smaller battery, which in turn results in a shorter battery life. 7i12qsk.